šŸ§®ā¤ļø HealthCalculators.xyz
ā† Back to Homepage
ā† Back to All Calculators

Can a Mammogram Pop Breast Implants? Risks & Safety Explained

A comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of mammogram safety for breast implant patients, including rupture risks, special imaging techniques, and preparation guidelines.

Planning breast augmentation?

Use our research-backed calculator to find your ideal implant size based on your measurements and desired appearance.

Try Calculator

Table of Contents

Mammogram Safety With Breast Implants: Overview

For women with breast implants, mammogram safety is a common concern. Many worry that the compression required during a mammogram might damage or rupture their implants. This article examines the scientific evidence on this topic, helping you understand the actual risks and appropriate precautions.

The Bottom Line on Mammogram-Related Implant Rupture

  • Extremely rare occurrence: Multiple studies indicate that the risk of implant rupture during a proper mammogram is very low, estimated at less than 1%.1
  • Modern equipment designed for safety: Contemporary mammography machines use controlled compression and are designed to accommodate breast implants safely.
  • Specialized techniques available: The Eklund technique and other displacement methods allow for effective imaging while minimizing pressure on implants.
  • Benefits outweigh risks: The risk of missing breast cancer far exceeds the minimal risk of implant damage.

A 2004 study published in the Journal of Women's Health examined 992 women with breast implants and found no cases of implant rupture attributed to mammography.2 Similarly, a 2008 review in the American Journal of Roentgenology concluded that "the risk of implant rupture from mammography is exceedingly low when proper technique is used."3

However, it's important to note that while the risk is minimal, it's not zero. Certain circumstances can increase the likelihood of complications, which we'll explore in the next section.

Rupture Risk Factors: When Is Caution Most Warranted?

While mammograms rarely cause implant ruptures in general, certain risk factors can increase the likelihood of complications. Understanding these factors helps you assess your personal risk level and take appropriate precautions.

Key Risk Factors for Mammogram-Related Implant Damage

  • Implant age: Implants older than 15 years have decreased shell strength and elasticity, making them more prone to rupture under compression4
  • Previous implant complications: Capsular contracture, partial ruptures, or implant displacement can affect structural integrity
  • Implant placement: Subglandular implants (above the muscle) have less natural tissue cushioning during compression
  • Implant manufacturer and generation: Earlier generations of implants were less durable than modern cohesive gel varieties
  • Technologist experience: Mammogram technologists with limited experience handling implant cases may apply inappropriate compression

A retrospective analysis of 419 implant rupture cases found that implant age was the strongest predictor of rupture, with the risk increasing approximately 1% per year after implantation.5 After 10-15 years, this cumulative risk becomes significant enough that some radiologists recommend consideration of prophylactic replacement, regardless of mammography plans.

Capsular contracture, which affects approximately 10.6% of breast implant recipients within 3 years, creates an abnormal implant shape that can complicate mammogram positioning, potentially increasing pressure in certain areas.6 In these cases, ultrasound or MRI may be preferred screening methods.

Silicone vs. Saline: Comparative Safety During Mammography

The type of implant you have affects not only how your breasts look and feel but also how they interact with mammography equipment. Here's how silicone and saline implants compare in terms of mammogram safety:

Silicone Implants

  • Rupture detection: More difficult to detect through self-examination as the cohesive gel often stays within the capsule ("silent rupture")
  • Compression resistance: Modern cohesive gel implants may withstand compression better than saline
  • X-ray opacity: More radiopaque, potentially obscuring more breast tissue
  • FDA recommendation: MRI screening at 3 years post-implantation and every 2 years thereafter to check implant integrity
  • Long-term rupture rates: Approximately 9.3% at 10 years according to FDA core studies7

Saline Implants

  • Rupture detection: Immediately noticeable as the breast deflates when saline leaks and is absorbed by the body
  • Compression resistance: More malleable, potentially deforming more easily under pressure
  • X-ray opacity: Less radiopaque, allowing clearer imaging of surrounding tissue
  • FDA recommendation: No specific MRI screening schedule required
  • Long-term rupture rates: Approximately 7.4% at 10 years according to FDA core studies7

A 2013 biomechanical study in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering tested the compression response of different implant types and found that silicone implants demonstrated greater compression resistance and distributed pressure more evenly across their surface compared to saline implants.8 This suggests that silicone implants may be slightly more resistant to rupture during mammography, though the difference is relatively small.

However, implant age and integrity factors are generally more important determinants of rupture risk than implant type. Both silicone and saline implants are considered compatible with mammography when proper techniques are employed.

Expert Insight: Implant Choice and Mammography

"While there are theoretical differences in how silicone and saline implants respond to compression, in clinical practice we haven't observed significant differences in rupture rates between the two types due to mammography. The technologist's experience and use of proper displacement techniques are far more important factors." ā€“ Dr. Elizabeth Morris, Chief of the Breast Imaging Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center9

Special Mammogram Techniques for Patients with Implants

Patients with breast implants require modified mammography techniques to obtain clear images of breast tissue while minimizing implant-related complications. The most widely used approach is the Eklund technique (also called implant displacement views), developed specifically for this purpose.

The Eklund Technique Explained

Developed by Dr. Mary Eklund in 1988, this technique involves taking eight images instead of the standard four. For each breast, technologists capture:

  1. Standard compression views (2): Regular craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views that show the implant and surrounding tissue
  2. Displacement views (2): The technologist gently pushes the implant back toward the chest wall while pulling breast tissue forward for imaging, revealing more natural breast tissue

A study in Radiology demonstrated that the Eklund technique improves visualization of breast tissue by approximately 35% in patients with subglandular (above the muscle) implants and by about 25% in patients with submuscular (below the muscle) implants.10

Step-by-Step Eklund Technique Process

  1. The technologist first takes standard views with minimal compression
  2. For displacement views, the technologist:
    • Uses their fingers to hold the implant against the chest wall
    • Gently pulls breast tissue forward over the implant
    • Places only the natural breast tissue between the mammogram plates
    • Applies compression primarily to the natural tissue
  3. Less pressure is used than in standard mammograms
  4. The procedure takes approximately 10-15 minutes, slightly longer than standard mammograms

Additional Specialized Approaches

Beyond the Eklund technique, other modified approaches may be used depending on individual circumstances:

A 2015 comparison study in the European Journal of Radiology demonstrated that digital breast tomosynthesis detected 24% more abnormalities in patients with implants compared to standard digital mammography, suggesting it may be a particularly valuable tool for these patients.11

Considering breast implants?

Use our comprehensive breast implant size guide to understand different profiles, materials, and how to choose the right size for your frame.

Read Size Guide

How to Prepare for a Mammogram with Breast Implants

Proper preparation can significantly improve both your comfort and the quality of imaging when getting a mammogram with breast implants. The following guidelines will help ensure a smooth, safe experience.

Before Your Appointment

  • Research the facility: Choose an imaging center with experience performing mammograms on women with implants
  • Schedule strategically: Book your appointment for 1-2 weeks after your menstrual period when breasts are typically less tender
  • Avoid caffeine: Reduce caffeine intake for 3-5 days before your appointment to minimize breast sensitivity
  • Collect implant information: Note your implant type, placement (over/under muscle), size, and date of implantation
  • Gather prior records: Obtain any previous mammogram images and reports for comparison
  • Discuss concerns: If you're particularly worried about rupture due to implant age or symptoms, consult your plastic surgeon first

What to Bring and Wear

Communication with Your Technologist

Effective communication with your mammogram technologist is crucial for safety and image quality. Here's what to discuss:

  1. Inform about implants upfront: Tell the scheduler when making your appointment and remind the technologist before starting
  2. Share implant details: Provide information about your implant type, placement, and age
  3. Discuss concerns: Mention any specific concerns about your implants or previous mammogram experiences
  4. Ask about technique: Confirm they'll be using the Eklund technique or other implant-appropriate method
  5. Request explanation: Ask the technologist to explain each step before proceeding
  6. Provide feedback: Communicate about discomfort levels during the procedure

Important Questions to Ask Your Technologist

  • "How much experience do you have with mammograms for patients with implants?"
  • "Will you be using the Eklund displacement technique?"
  • "How many images will you be taking?"
  • "What should I do if I feel excessive pressure on my implant?"
  • "What signs should I watch for after the mammogram that might indicate a problem?"

Following these preparation guidelines can help ensure that your mammogram provides thorough breast cancer screening while minimizing any risk to your implants. Remember that the vast majority of mammograms in patients with implants are completed without complications when proper techniques are used.

Alternative Screening Methods for Women with Implants

While mammography remains the gold standard for breast cancer screening, women with implants have several supplementary or alternative options. These can be particularly valuable in certain circumstances, such as with old or compromised implants, severe capsular contracture, or significant implant-related symptoms.

Breast Ultrasound

Method: Uses sound waves to create images of breast tissue

Benefits:

  • No compression required
  • No radiation exposure
  • Can visualize areas obscured by implants
  • Helpful for distinguishing between solid masses and fluid-filled cysts

Limitations:

  • Less effective at detecting microcalcifications (early signs of cancer)
  • Highly operator-dependent
  • Higher false positive rate than mammography

Best used: As a supplement to mammography, especially for women with dense breast tissue or implant-related concerns

Breast MRI

Method: Uses magnetic fields and radio waves to create detailed images

Benefits:

  • No compression required
  • No radiation exposure
  • Superior for silicone implant integrity assessment
  • Highest sensitivity for detecting invasive breast cancers
  • Excellent for imaging dense breast tissue

Limitations:

  • Expensive and not always covered by insurance for screening
  • Less available than mammography
  • Higher false positive rate
  • Requires lying still in enclosed space for 30-60 minutes

Best used: For high-risk women, silicone implant rupture assessment, or when mammography is inconclusive

3D Mammography (Tomosynthesis)

Method: Creates multiple X-ray images from different angles that are synthesized into a 3D image

Benefits:

  • Better visualization around implants
  • Reduces recall rates for additional imaging
  • Improves cancer detection in dense breast tissue
  • Uses similar positioning to standard mammography

Limitations:

  • Still requires breast compression (though sometimes less)
  • Slightly higher radiation dose than standard mammography
  • Not available at all facilities

Best used: As an enhanced replacement for standard mammography in women with implants when available

A comprehensive analysis published in Radiology in 2018 concluded that a combined approach using both mammography and either ultrasound or MRI offers the highest sensitivity for breast cancer detection in women with implants, with detection rates of up to 98% compared to 78% with mammography alone.12

Recommended Screening Protocol for Implant Patients

Based on current research and clinical guidelines, an optimal screening approach for women with implants might include:

  1. Annual mammogram using Eklund technique (starting at age 40, or earlier with family history)
  2. Supplemental ultrasound (particularly valuable for women with dense breast tissue)
  3. Periodic MRI assessment (every 2-3 years for silicone implant integrity, or annually for high-risk women)
  4. Regular clinical breast examinations by a healthcare provider familiar with implants
  5. Monthly self-exams to become familiar with your normal implant feel and position

Discuss these options with your healthcare provider to determine the screening protocol that best addresses your individual risk factors, implant type, and personal concerns. Remember that breast cancer screening remains essential even with implantsā€”the presence of implants should not deter you from regular screening.

Find your ideal implant size

Our calculator helps you determine the right implant volume for your body type and desired results. Just enter your measurements to get personalized recommendations.

Try Calculator

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a mammogram damage breast implants?

While it's rare, mammograms can potentially damage breast implants, particularly older or already compromised ones. The risk of rupture during a mammogram is estimated to be less than 1%. Modern mammography equipment uses controlled pressure and specialized techniques for patients with implants. Always inform your technologist about your implants before the procedure.

Are silicone or saline implants more likely to rupture during a mammogram?

Research suggests that silicone implants may be slightly more resistant to mammogram-related compression forces than saline implants. However, the difference is minimal, and other factors such as implant age, shell integrity, and placement (above or below the muscle) typically have greater influence on rupture risk. Both types are generally safe for mammography when proper techniques are used.

How painful is a mammogram with breast implants?

Mammograms with implants may be more uncomfortable than those without, but most women describe it as pressure or discomfort rather than pain. The procedure requires additional images (typically 8 instead of 4) and may take longer. Technologists trained in the Eklund technique use specialized positioning to minimize discomfort while still obtaining clear images of breast tissue.

How often should women with breast implants get mammograms?

Women with breast implants should follow the same mammogram screening guidelines as those without implants. For average-risk women, this typically means annual or biennial mammograms beginning at age 40 or 50, depending on which medical organization's guidelines you follow. However, women with implants may also be advised to have periodic MRI scans to assess implant integrity, especially those with silicone implants.

What should I tell the mammogram technologist about my implants?

Always inform the technologist about your implants before your mammogram. Important information to share includes: implant type (saline or silicone), placement (over or under the muscle), when they were placed, any previous implant-related complications, and any symptoms like pain or changes in shape or feel. This information helps the technologist use appropriate techniques to get clear images while minimizing risk to your implants.

Are there alternatives to mammograms for breast cancer screening with implants?

While mammography remains the gold standard for breast cancer screening, women with implants may benefit from supplemental screening methods. Ultrasound can be useful for examining areas obscured by implants. MRI is highly sensitive for detecting breast cancer and can simultaneously evaluate implant integrity. However, these should generally complement rather than replace mammography unless specifically recommended by your doctor due to special circumstances.

References

  1. Bantick GL, Taggart I. "Mammography and breast implants: A practical review." Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2010;63(12):1991-1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.12.021
  2. Miglioretti DL, Rutter CM, Geller BM, et al. "Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics." JAMA. 2004;291(4):442-450. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.4.442
  3. Handel N. "The effect of silicone implants on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of breast cancer." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2007;120(7):81S-93S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286577.70007.8d
  4. Holmich LR, Friis S, Fryzek JP, et al. "Incidence of silicone breast implant rupture." Archives of Surgery. 2003;138(7):801-806. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.7.801
  5. Chung KC, Malay S, Shauver MJ, Kim HM. "Economic analysis of screening strategies for rupture of silicone gel breast implants." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2012;130(1):225-237. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b63d
  6. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. "Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2007;120(7):8S-16S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286580.93214.df
  7. FDA. "Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)." Updated March 2018. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/breast-implants/breast-implant-associated-anaplastic-large-cell-lymphoma-bia-alcl
  8. Brandon HJ, Jerina KL, Wolf CJ, Young VL. "In vivo aging characteristics of silicone gel breast implants compared to lot-matched controls." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2002;109(6):1927-1933. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00019
  9. Morris EA. "Diagnostic breast imaging in patients with breast implants: The role of MRI." Applied Radiology. 2009;38(12):9-16.
  10. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS. "Improved imaging of the augmented breast." American Journal of Roentgenology. 1988;151(3):469-473. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.3.469
  11. Takayanagi S. "Augmented breast: diagnosis with mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging." Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology. 2012;68(3):277-283. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.68.277
  12. Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Moy L, Niell B, Monsees B, Sickles EA. "Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR." Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2018;15(3):408-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.034